The Peace and Freedom Party has taken positions for or against 15 bills and one proposed constitutional amendment in the 2019-2020 session of the California legislature; we are currently watching the progression of 13 other bills. Below run the PFP’s current positions on this legislation. For the full text and more information on a bill, click on the given bill’s title.
Additionally, the PFP Legislative Committee has drafted and sent several letters to state senators and assemblypersons detailing the party's support of or opposition to each bill. Each position letter may be accessed individually via the links marked [Position letter] below or click here for a list of all PFP position letters. Last update: May 23, 2019
• AB 32 (Bonta) – State prisons: private, for-profit administration services – SUPPORT
Would end state of California contracts with private prisons. [Position letter]
• AB 33 (Bonta) – State public retirement systems: divestiture from private prison companies – SUPPORT
Would stop CalPERS and CalSTRS investments in private prisons. [Position letter]
• AB 36 (Bonta/Chiu) – Residential tenancies: rent control – SUPPORT
Would modify those provisions of Costa-Hawkins that prevent local rent control measures from applying to new construction. [Position letter]
• AB 392 (Weber) – Peace officers: deadly force – SUPPORT
Would restrict police officers’ use of deadly force to only when necessary to prevent serious bodily injury or death. [Position letter]
• AB 646 (McCarty) – Elections: voter eligibility – SUPPORT
Would allow those on parole to register to vote if ACA 6 becomes law. [Position letter]
• ACA 6 (McCarty) – Elections: Disqualification of Electors – SUPPORT
Would delete the prohibition on voting while on felony parole from the State Constitution, and would reword the section of the state Constitution regarding prohibition on voting while imprisoned for a felony.
• AB 1217 (Mullin) – Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures – SUPPORT
Would expand the disclosure act to cover both issue ads and sham issue ads. [Position letter]
• AB 1481 (Bonta) – Tenancy Termination: Just Cause – SUPPORT
Would tighten restrictions on unwarranted evictions by residential rental property owners. [Position letter]
• AB 1829 (Berman, Gallagher, Low, Mayes, Mullin and Weber) – Elections – OPPOSE (unless amended)
Would modify certain candidate-filling procedures for California elections and further defines the parameters of special elections. [Position letter]
• SB 47 (Allen) – Initiative, referendum, and recall petitions: disclosures – SUPPORT
Would require disclosure of top funders and contributors to state or local initiative, referendum, or recall petition drives. [Position letter]
• SB 57 (Bates) – California New Motor Voter Registration Program – OPPOSE
From the bill’s text: “This bill would […] require a person to affirmatively agree to become registered or preregistered to vote during a transaction with the DMV before the Secretary registers or preregisters that person…” [Position letter]
• SB 212 (Allen) – Elections: Local voting methods – SUPPORT
Would allow for the use of ranked choice voting for general law cities and school districts in either single-seat or multi-seat districts.
• SB 230 (Caballero) – Law enforcement: use of deadly force: training: policies – OPPOSITION WITHDRAWN
Would require law enforcement agencies to provide guidelines on use of, and alternatives to, deadly force. Would also require that the agencies make the guidelines publicly accessible.
• SB 505 (Umberg) – Presidential Primary Elections – OPPOSE
Would define a generally advocated or recognized candidate for President of the United States by setting forth the following criteria.
A candidate must submit proof of at least two of the following:
- (a) candidate is qualified for funding under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974;
- (b) the candidate has appeared in a national presidential debate;
- (c) the candidate has been placed or qualified for placement on a primary or caucus ballot in at least one other state in the current presidential election cycle;
- (d) the candidate has been or has qualified to be a candidate in a caucus in at least one other state in the current presidential election cycle; and
- (e) the candidate has *all* of the following:
- (1) at least one campaign office in California,
- (2) a presidential campaign website,
- (3) a statement of candidacy filed with the Federal Election Commission seeking the office of President, and
- (4) a written request submitted on the candidate’s behalf to the Secretary of State by a party qualified to participate in a primary election and is the party that the candidate is registered to vote with on the candidates affidavit of registration.
• SB 641 (Allen) – Special Elections – SUPPORT WITHDRAWN
Would allow Ranked Choice Voting to be used in general law special elections. [Position letter]
The PFP Legislative Committee is also watching the following Assembly Bills and Senate Bills and may yet take an official position before the end of the 2019-2020 legislative session: